One of the most interesting pedagogical debates being argued about today focuses on whether or not students should be assigned homework. If so, in what amounts? If not, in what grade levels? I’ve looked at a lot of articles on the subject, and I have to say I agree with those who see a need for a serious reduction in the amount of out-of-school work that’s being assigned to students. The anti-homework crowd isn’t pushing an end to all homework in every grade level. What seems to make the most sense to me involves no homework for kids in elementary school, some creative and worthwhile exercises for middle school students (though no more than a half hour a night), and around an hour and half a night at most for high school students.

I’m not some fanatical extremist who lives in a shack out in the woods, and I’m not the only person who thinks homework is doing more harm than good in our educational system. The American Educational Research Association had this to say:

“Whenever homework crowds out social experience, outdoor recreation, and creative activities, and whenever it usurps time that should be devoted to sleep, it is not meeting the basic needs of children and adolescents.”

One of the most interesting perspectives on the no homework policy comes from Etta Kralovec and John Buell in there book End Homework Now. Rather than looking at homework from the dogmatic perspective of how it affects test scores and what role it plays in the ‘sinking in’ of classroom topics, End Homework Now focuses sharply on what homework does to the families’ free time, the students lives, and the communities they live in.

The premise I’m most inclined to agree with is this: People’s lives are getting busier. The amount of hours in the average workweek continues to rise. More and more children are raised in single parent homes. Homework is being assigned to kids and families with no time to complete it. This cycle of overworked students and parents adds stress to the family that need not be there, and all this extra work ends up taking away from the precious little unstructured family time that’s left. One result of all this is that kids don’t have time to be kids, and parents don’t get the meaningful time they need to instill their own values on their children. Another is that young students end up with a bad taste in their mouths over the subject of homework, and find ways to avoid it, or cheat, rather than engage it willfully. In reading the blog posts of teachers who’ve adopted this policy, I’ve noticed that many have had incredibly positive results. By allowing students more free time after school, they came to school refreshed and more willing to learn.

But isn’t homework a necessary part of a child’s education? First, let’s dispel a homework myth: homework is the key to academic success. The research is in on this topic, and the results are all over the radar. Research results regularly contradict one another in determining the value of homework, especially in the secondary level. Most researchers, however, have agreed that homework in elementary school has little or no bearing on students’ academic achievement. Proponents of assigning homework have maintained that for young students, the content of the homework is less important than the discipline that comes from doing it regularly. Students will learn self-discipline, deadline sensitivity, time management, and all the skills that will help prepare them for life as an adult. There’s one problem with that, and Kralovec and Buell put it best:

“asking children to perform tasks before they are developmentally ready proves counterproductive to development . . . Lacking solid evidence, homework supporters ask us to take on faith the notion that homework can instill desirable character traits.” 

Link to Etta Kralovec and John Buell’s End Homework Now.